Our editorial process

Evidence, context, and clear attribution.

We interpret developments in advertising for people working in defense and space.

Start with the evidence

We prioritize regulations, official announcements, platform documentation, and original research. News briefs distinguish the date of an event from the date it was reported. Coverage separates proposed rules, effective requirements, enforcement allegations, and final outcomes.

Make the application explicit

We explain why a development matters to a marketing or communications team. Analysis and thought experiments are labeled. Technical specifications describe possible data flows; claims about a particular platform require evidence about that platform.

Credit the actual author

AI-assisted editorial work is credited to the Trihelix AI team and disclosed on the article. Pieces written by Joseph Watkins carry his byline. We do not invent his experiences or publish AI-generated first-person commentary as his writing.

Explain our interests

ADINT is published by Trihelix. We may discuss Refraction, Aperture, and other Trihelix capabilities when relevant. Product references are separate from evidence supporting a factual claim. We explain public principles and limitations without disclosing client information or proprietary methods.

Keep the record clear

Substantive revisions receive an updated date and a correction note where appropriate. Publication dates reflect when a story goes live. Readers can raise a correction through Trihelix’s contact page.